Most Active Stories
- Scott MacKay Commentary: Providence Journal, We Knew Ye Well
- Scott MacKay Commentary: More Twists In Providence Mayoral Contest
- Cianci Says He Expected A Two-Man Fight When He Entered the Mayoral Race
- TGIF: 12 Things to Know About Rhode Island Politics & Media
- Rhody Votes '14: Republicans for Governor Debate
Tue July 23, 2013
Rhode Island AG asked to weigh in on Whether Dog Ban Applies to Pawtucket
The City of Pawtucket said a new state law blocking cities and towns from banning certain breeds of animals does not apply to them. At issue is Pawtucket’s longstanding ban against the ownership of pit bulls.
Pawtucket officials said they will continue to enforce a ban on pit bulls despite a new state law that forbids cities and towns from outlawing the ownership of specific breeds of dogs or cats. Pawtucket director of administration Tony Pires said the law applies only to future bans, not ones already on the books like theirs.
“Generally speaking, unless the General Assembly intended for the legislation to be retroactive, everything is any events happening going forward or prospectively,” said Pires.
But the sponsor of the law, state Rep. Thomas Palangio, disagrees. “Federal law supersedes state law. State law supersedes municipal law. And that’s kind of 101. I think they’re just grabbing at straws,” he said.
Palangio has asked Attorney General Peter Kilmartin for a legal opinion on the dispute.
Do you have insight or expertise on this topic? Please email us, we'd like to hear from you. email@example.com