Most Active Stories
- TGIF: 17 Things to Know About Rhode Island Politics & Media
- Scott MacKay Commentary: The War Is On Thanksgiving, Not Christmas
- Scott MacKay Commentary: Is The Mattiello-Paiva Weed Geezer Tax Cut Plan Realistic?
- Matt Jerzyk Joins Speaker Mattiello's Staff As Deputy Legal Counsel
- Phil West On Two Decades Of "Secrets & Scandals" In Rhode Island
Fri May 10, 2013
Women & Infants Researcher Counters Critics of Premature Baby Study
Women and Infants Hospital is responding to allegations that a research study of premature babies in which it participated didn’t properly inform parents of the risks.
The SUPPORT study, as it’s known, involved more than 1300 extremely premature infants at more than 20 hospitals nationwide, including Women and Infants. The goal was to settle a long open question in the neonatal intensive care unit: how much oxygen do these babies need? Some of the babies received a lower dose, some higher, but every dose fell within what physicians consider an acceptable range. But the federal Office of Human Research Protections and the advocacy group Public Citizen criticized the study. They said parents weren’t informed of the risks. Women and Infants researcher Dr. Abbot Laptook says there weren’t any additional risks to babies in the study.
“We thought when we did the study that there wasn’t any potential harm since both ranges of oxygen saturation were considered what was within the standard of care at that point in time," said Laptook.
Editorials in prominent medical journals and the nation’s oldest bioethics think tank have praised the study. They say critics misunderstood the risks.